Introduction
For thousands of years, men have used lanolin for its remarkable ability to protect, hydrate, and restore the skin. This natural wax, derived from sheep’s wool, has been used from ancient medicinal preparations to modern skincare formulations, demonstrating its enduring value across cultures and time. Unlike many common emollients, which simply create a barrier on the skin through their occlusive properties, lanolin seals in moisture but also attracts and holds water, making it an exceptionally effective ingredient for maintaining skin hydration.
Despite its long history, lanolin’s popularity has fluctuated over time. The 20th century saw a decline in its use due to the rise of synthetic alternatives, concerns over purity, and misconceptions about allergenicity. However, modern purification techniques and a growing demand for sustainable, naturally derived ingredients have led to its resurgence. Scientific research continues to highlight lanolin’s unique ability to nourish and repair the skin, reinforcing its place in contemporary skincare and dermatology.
This article explores lanolin’s origins, scientific properties, historical significance and evolving role in the cosmetic and medical industries. From its early usage during antique times to its reinvention as a premium skincare ingredient, lanolin’s story is a compelling example of how nature, when harnessed wisely, can offer long-lasting solutions for skin health.
Understanding lanolin: nature’s moisturizer
Lanolin is a natural waxy substance secreted by the sebaceous glands of sheep, forming a protective layer on their wool. Chemically, lanolin comprises esters, diesters, and hydroxy esters of long-chain fatty acids and alcohols, giving it unique moisture-binding properties1,2. Unlike triglyceride-based fats, lanolin is classified as a wax due to its high ester content and absence of glycerol1,2.
One of lanolin’s most valuable properties is its moisturizing effect, which makes it a highly sought-after ingredient in skincare products. It functions as both an occlusive (preventing water loss) and a humectant (attracting water), a rare combination that enhances its ability to hydrate the skin1,3.
Lanolin in nature: a product of evolution
Lanolin evolved as a biological adaptation in sheep, protecting their wool and skin from environmental stressors. Wool is naturally absorbent, which would make sheep highly susceptible to moisture retention and related complications. However, lanolin repels water, prevents excessive moisture buildup, and shields the wool from rain, wind, and other harsh elements1,2.
Beyond water resistance, lanolin also helps protect sheep from extreme temperature variations and prevents wool from becoming brittle2. Human skincare and cosmetics use the very same protective properties.
Unique characteristics: moisturizing and protective properties
Lanolin’s ability to retain water is one of its defining characteristics. It can absorb up to 400% of its weight in water, making it an effective ingredient for stabilizing water-in-oil emulsions used in skincare and pharmaceutical formulations1,2. This property allows it to enhance hydration while maintaining a breathable barrier on the skin.
Additionally, lanolin is structurally similar to the lipids found in human skin, particularly those in the stratum corneum, the outermost layer. This similarity enables lanolin to integrate into the skin’s lipid matrix, helping to reinforce the skin’s natural barrier1,3. This function is particularly beneficial in treating dry skin, as it helps restore moisture balance.
However, unlike some synthetic occlusives, lanolin is semi-permeable, which prevents excessive moisture loss while allowing for normal skin respiration1. This characteristic can make it preferable for individuals seeking deep hydration without a heavy or greasy residue.
Beyond its occlusive properties, lanolin penetrates the stratum corneum and intercellular spaces, spontaneously forming an emulsion with epidermal water4. This process provides an additional mechanism for water retention within the skin, improving hydration at a deeper level.
This moisture absorption makes the skin surface smoother, and small fissures and cracks close, reducing potential entry points for pathogens and improving skin texture.
Finally, its ability to create a moist environment can also play a role in wound healing by promoting re-epithelialization and dermal repair4.
Early human awareness of lanolin benefits and the history of its use
The discovery of lanolin’s potential
The beneficial properties of lanolin were likely discovered through direct contact with raw wool. Ancient societies that relied on sheep for textiles would have noticed that handling wool left their hands softer and more resistant to dryness and cracking. While no surviving texts explicitly document this early realization, it is reasonable to infer that shepherds, wool traders, and textile workers became aware of lanolin’s moisturizing effects through everyday experience2,4.
The first documented evidence of lanolin extraction and use dates back to ancient Greece, around 700 BCE. Historical records show that people boiled sheep’s wool and skimmed off the floating fat-like substance—an early version of crude wool wax extraction. Later, they referred to this substance as oesypum, a term the Greek physician Dioscorides used in the 1st century CE2,4,5,6.
The evolution of lanolin in skincare and industrial production
Although lanolin’s skin-conditioning properties were known for centuries, large-scale purification did not begin until the 19th century2,4,5,6. Before industrial processing, crude lanolin was difficult to extract in large quantities, limiting its availability.
The turning point came in 1882 when Otto Braun and Oscar Liebreich developed a centrifugation method to separate wool fat from the water used in wool washing2,4,5,6. This advancement made it possible to produce lanolin on an industrial scale, significantly increasing its accessibility for cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical applications.
Otto Braun also introduced the term “lanolin,” derived from the Latin words “lano” (wool) and “oleum” (oil)—a name that perfectly captured the substance’s origin and nature4,5,6. Initially registered as a patented trademark, the term eventually became the widely accepted generic name for purified wool fat.
With the ability to extract and refine lanolin efficiently, its use expanded beyond traditional ointments into mainstream skincare, wound healing treatments, and dermatological formulations. Throughout the first half of the 20th century, lanolin established itself as a key ingredient in cosmetic and pharmaceutical skincare products5.
Lanolin’s transition during the 20th century
Despite its exceptional moisturizing properties, lanolin has gradually declined in mainstream skincare formulations due to regulatory stigma, evolving market trends, and formulation challenges.
Industrialization and petrochemical alternatives
The rise of synthetic alternatives to lanolin in the 20th century was closely tied to industrialization and advancements in petroleum refining. One of the most significant developments was the discovery and commercialization of petroleum jelly (petrolatum), which became a dominant alternative to natural animal-derived moisturizers like lanolin7.
Petrolatum was first discovered in 1859 by chemist Robert Chesebrough, who observed oil workers using a thick, waxy residue from drilling equipment to heal minor cuts and burns. After refining the substance into what would later become Vaseline, he successfully marketed it as a versatile skin protectant. Its occlusive properties greatly reduced trans-epidermal water loss, providing an affordable and widely available alternative to traditional emollients7.
By the early 20th century, the expanding petrochemical industry began introducing a range of synthetic moisturizers and emulsifiers, offering cost-effective and scalable solutions for large-scale skincare production7. These new ingredients were cheaper to produce and, at the time, had greater stability and longer shelf lives than lanolin, which was prone to oxidation and required intensive processing1,7.
Refinement and purity issues
Lanolin’s early industrial processing methods did not always ensure the highest purity, contributing to occasional reports of skin irritation and allergic reactions. Raw lanolin, also known as wool grease, is naturally contaminated with dirt, sweat salts (suint), and residues from the sheep’s environment, including pesticides and farm chemicals . These impurities, combined with free fatty acids and residual detergents from the wool-scouring process, led to variations in lanolin quality and reinforced concerns about its safety in cosmetic and medical applications2.
Over time, advancements in purification techniques have significantly improved the quality of lanolin. Modern processing involves multi-stage centrifugation, solvent extractions, and vacuum treatments to remove contaminants and unwanted residues2.
When lanolin reaches its pharmaceutical-grade form, it is more than 99% pure, with pesticide residues reduced to less than 1 mg/kg—well below regulatory safety limits2.
Despite these improvements, lanolin’s reputation had already suffered damage. Concerns over past impurities led many brands to replace lanolin with synthetic alternatives or label products as « lanolin-free, » even as the ingredient became safer and more refined. Today, medical-grade lanolin is considered hypoallergenic, but its historical association with skin irritation still influences public perception and industry decisions2,6.
Concerns over allergies and sensitivities
The belief that lanolin is a major allergen is primarily the result of a misinterpretation of early dermatological studies rather than strong scientific evidence4,5,6.
The issue traces back to a 1953 study by Sulzberger et al., which investigated skin hypersensitivity by conducting patch tests on 1,048 dermatology patients and 120 healthy volunteers. The results showed that only 1.14% of dermatology patients reacted to lanolin, while none of the healthy volunteers showed any sensitivity. The authors themselves emphasized that the patients tested were already suffering from allergic dermatoses, making them more likely to react to various substances.
However, this context was often overlooked, leading to the erroneous belief that lanolin posed a significant allergenic risk to the general population4,5,6.
This misconception was further reinforced in 1976, when the EEC Cosmetics Directive mandated warning labels on products containing lanolin, citing potential allergenicity concerns. Although the regulation was retracted in 1982, the damage had already been done. Many skincare brands and dermatologists had begun avoiding lanolin, believing it to be a high-risk sensitizer, despite subsequent research proving otherwise4,6.
Even as modern purification techniques have significantly reduced allergenic components, lanolin’s reputation as a potential irritant persisted for decades. This widespread caution ultimately led to its gradual removal from many cosmetic and pharmaceutical formulations.
Ethical and animal welfare considerations
As awareness of animal welfare and ethical consumerism grew in the latter half of the 20th century, some consumers became skeptical of lanolin due to its association with animal-derived ingredients. Although lanolin is harvested without harming sheep, some consumers preferred plant-based or synthetic alternatives. The rise of vegan and cruelty-free skincare movements further reduced demand for lanolin-based products6,8.
While modern ethical sourcing practices ensure that lanolin production does not harm animals, its animal-based origin has become a barrier for certain consumer demographics6,8.
How marketing influenced lanolin’s decline
Lanolin’s decline in skincare was not the result of widespread consumer rejection but rather a marketing-driven shift fueled by misconceptions, industry trends, and the rise of the « oil-free » movement. While brands distanced themselves from lanolin due to perceived allergen concerns, consumer research suggests that public perception was never actually negative.
Public perception vs. industry decisions
Many skincare brands removed lanolin from formulations based on the assumption that consumers viewed it negatively. However, a survey across five major European countries found that only 0.2% of consumers actively avoided lanolin in skincare products. Despite this, brands embraced « lanolin-free » labels, reinforcing the idea that it was undesirable.
Meanwhile, lanolin remained widely used—with over 5,000 formulations containing it in 1979 and nearly 3,000 still registered with the FDA in 1996—showing that its removal was more about marketing perception than genuine consumer demand6.
The rise of the « oil-free » trend
Lanolin’s decline was further reinforced by the rise of « oil-free » skincare, which became a dominant trend in the late 20th century. Like the “fat-free” food movement, beauty brands capitalized on flawed dermatological tests from the 1970s that falsely labelled oils as pore-clogging. This led to the widespread belief that oils caused acne, despite evidence showing they are essential for skin health9.
As a result, lanolin—a lipid-rich, semi-occlusive moisturizer—was phased out in favor of silicone-based alternatives. These alternatives provided a lightweight, smooth feel but lacked the deep nourishment of natural oils. Ironically, many “oil-free” products still contained oil-derived ingredients like triglycerides and esters, demonstrating that the industry’s stance on oils was more about branding than science9.
Despite these shifts, research now confirms that oils—including lanolin—are essential for maintaining a healthy skin barrier, regulating sebum, and preventing dehydration9.
The rediscovery of lanolin as a ‘Hero Ingredient’
The shift toward natural, sustainable skincare
Over the past two decades, consumer demand for natural beauty products has surged, driven by increasing skepticism toward synthetic chemicals and a growing emphasis on sustainability. The shift toward health- and environmentally-conscious beauty choices has led many to seek minimally processed, naturally derived ingredients over petroleum-based or silicone-heavy formulations8.
Lanolin, extracted from sheep’s wool without harming the animal, aligns seamlessly with this “clean beauty” movement. It appeals to consumers looking for bio-compatible, sustainable moisturizers that work harmoniously with the skin. Unlike mineral oils and petrolatum, lanolin is a renewable, naturally occurring substance, reinforcing its place in the rising eco-conscious skincare market1,6,7.
A growing segment of eco-aware and health-conscious consumers prioritizes transparency in ingredient sourcing. This trend mirrors trends in the farm-to-face skincare movement, which values ethically harvested, traceable ingredients. With increased awareness of environmental impact and product purity, brands have reintroduced lanolin as a premium ingredient, highlighting its effectiveness over synthetic alternatives1,8.
The shift toward natural, scientifically backed skincare has made lanolin a compelling choice for those seeking sustainable, high-performance moisturization. As modern beauty consumers demand clean, responsibly sourced ingredients, lanolin’s resurgence reflects a broader return to trusted, time-tested formulations that align with both health and environmental values1,8.
Modern ultra-purified lanolin: addressing past concerns
One of the key drivers behind lanolin’s resurgence in skincare and medical applications is the advancement in refining and purification technologies.
From crude to hypoallergenic lanolin
Early industrial-grade lanolin contained trace impurities such as free fatty alcohols, pesticide residues, and detergent remnants from wool processing, contributing to skin irritation and sensitization in some individuals2.
However, today’s ultra-purified, medical-grade lanolin undergoes2,4:
- Molecular distillation and multi-stage filtration, removing allergens and contaminants.
- Ultra-refining techniques that reduce free lanolin alcohols to below 3%, significantly lowering the risk of irritation.
Clinical studies confirm that modern, hypoallergenic lanolin has a near-zero sensitization potential, making it safe for most individuals. This has helped restore lanolin’s reputation, allowing dermatologists, formulators, and skincare brands to reintroduce it confidently into high-performance skincare and medical products1,4,5,6.
Scientific validation: lanolin’s unparalleled ability to hydrate, repair, and protect
Lanolin’s efficacy as an emollient and skin protector has been extensively validated through historical use and modern scientific studies. Its ability to penetrate the stratum corneum and integrate into intercellular lipid structures makes it uniquely effective in restoring the skin barrier and enhancing hydration9,8. Unlike purely occlusive agents like petrolatum, lanolin offers a dual-action moisturizing effect: It reduces transepidermal water loss (TEWL) by 20–30% while simultaneously acting as a humectant, absorbing up to 400% of its weight in water1.
Additionally, lanolin’s physical structure closely mimics human skin lipids, as demonstrated by cross-polarized light microscopy, which reveals the presence of multilamellar structures typical of liquid crystals. This structural similarity enhances its ability to integrate with and reinforce the skin barrier, improving its ability to retain moisture over time4.
Beyond hydration, lanolin can be used in wound healing and skin repair. It accelerates the healing process by forming a moist environment conducive to re-epithelialization and dermal regeneration, particularly in conditions like dry, cracked skin. This can make it a valuable therapeutic agent in medical treatments where restoring the skin barrier is critical4.
Thanks to these unique properties, modern ultra-purified lanolin is one of the most effective natural emollients. It combines hydration, barrier support, and repair mechanisms that outperform many synthetic alternatives.
Conclusion: lanolin as a symbol of human ingenuity & sustainability
Lanolin represents a practical example of how humans have learned to work with nature rather than against it. Extracted from wool, it is not the result of a resource-intensive industry but a byproduct of an existing agricultural system, making it a sustainable and efficient material. Its continued use reflects human ingenuity in recognizing and refining naturally occurring substances to meet essential needs while minimizing waste.
A byproduct that maximizes resources
All natural resources—whether plant-based or animal-derived—require land, water, and energy. However, lanolin does not require additional farming beyond what is already necessary for wool production. Unlike crops cultivated specifically for oils, lanolin is obtained without competing for agricultural land or requiring dedicated monocultures. When managed responsibly, sheep farming can contribute to regenerative grazing systems that support soil health and biodiversity.
This efficient use of resources makes lanolin a low-impact material that aligns with modern sustainability goals. Rather than discarding wool grease as waste, humans have learned to extract and refine it into a highly functional ingredient, demonstrating a circular approach to resource utilization.
Nature-inspired functionality
Beyond its sustainability, lanolin embodies biomimicry by adapting natural solutions for human benefit. Its structure closely mimics the lipids in human skin, allowing it to integrate into the skin barrier. Unlike synthetic alternatives that form an artificial film, lanolin works with the body’s natural processes, locking in moisture while remaining breathable1,4.
This balance between effectiveness and natural compatibility highlights human ingenuity in recognizing and using nature’s protective mechanisms.
A time-tested yet future-proof ingredient
Lanolin’s continued relevance in skincare and pharmaceuticals underlines the value of well-sourced and well-refined natural materials. While industries frequently chase innovation for its own sake, lanolin proves that some of the best solutions have existed for centuries and require refinement, not replacement.
As sustainability becomes a driving force in material selection, lanolin is an example of how existing natural resources, when responsibly managed, can remain effective and ethical. It is neither outdated nor obsolete but rather a model for how humans can refine and elevate what nature already provides.
References
- Dobos KA. Ingredient Profile: Lanolin and Plant-Based Alternatives for Natural
Moisturization. Cosmetics & Toiletries. 2024 Oct 28 [Internet]. Available from:
https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/formulas-products/skin-care/article/22921829/ingredi
ent-profile-lanolin-and-plantbased-alternatives-for-natural-moisturization - Sengupta A, Behera J. Comprehensive view on chemistry, manufacturing & applications
of lanolin extracted from wool pretreatment. Am J Eng Res. 2014;3(7):33-43. e-ISSN :
2320-0847 p-ISSN : 2320-0936 - Climan A. The Benefits and Uses of Lanolin, Backed by Science. Verywell Health. 2025
Jan 06 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.verywellhealth.com/lanolin-5081303 - Stone L. Medilan: a hypoallergenic lanolin for emollient therapy. Br J Nurs.
2000;9(1):54-56. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2000.9.1.6415 - Lis K. Hypersensitivity to Lanolin: An Old–New Problem. Life. 2024;14(1553).
https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121553 - Orr S. Lanolin Demythologised. Lanolin.co.nz. 2005 Sep 28 [Internet]. Available from:
https://web.archive.org/web/20050207080609/http://www.lanolin.co.nz/article001p1.htm - Divya JN and al. Petroleum Jelly: A Brief Review of its History, Uses and Safety. Int J
Pharm Clin Res. 2024;16(10):914-921. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.06.010 - Kim S, Seock YK. Impacts of health and environmental consciousness on young female
consumers’ attitude towards and purchase of natural beauty products. Int J Consum Stud.
2009;33(6):627-638. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00817.x - Defin J. How Marketing Made ‘Oil-Free’ a Thing. 2020 Aug 13 [Internet]. Available from:
https://jessicadefino.substack.com/p/how-marketing-made-oil-free-a-thing-1ba0589edddb